Infanrix Hexa Vaccine Maims And Kills Babies
Garden of GSK Secrets
By Heidi Stevenson
January 20, 2013
Infanrix Kills and Maims, but GSK Hid It from Doctors & Parents
GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) wanted to keep the public from knowing about the adverse effects of their Infanrix vaccine. The secret report slipped out, and it’s revealing. It validates the recent study showing that multiple vaccine doses increase the death rate by 50% — but there’s no real change to the safety advice.
Infanrix is a vaccine that was released without any serious testing for safety, in spite of the fact that it contains antigens of six diseases for injection into babies as young as two months. In a cozy relationship with government, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) was able to keep information about harm from the public. Fortunately, that secrecy was broken with the leak of a report given to the Belgian government. It delineates 1,742 adverse events associated with Infanrix.
These are adverse effects that were reported to GSK. The information is not pretty—especially when you realize that the vast majority of vaccine injuries are never reported and that deaths counted included only sudden death. First, though, let’s just take a quick look at what the report admitted happened over the two-year period from 23 October 2009 through 22 October 2011:
825 adverse effects were identified.
36 deaths occurred.
Adverse events include autism, encephalitis, heart failure, gaze palsy (indicative of neurological damage), gastrointestinal hemorrhage, jaundice, mental retardation (classed as not serious!), removal of part of the intestine (also defined as not serious!), opisthotonos (yet again labeled as not serious!), paralysis. Guillain Barré syndrome, convulsions, and many others.
Naturally, not all the reported events were actually caused by Infanrix. GSK reported that the number of reported adverse events was only 14.6 per 100,000. However, as reported by Initiative Citoyenne, the doctors’ publication, Revue française du Practicien, reports that this figure is likely only 1-10% of the reality.
Spinning and Twisting the Results
On page 11 of the report, GSK unequivocally states that they are the arbiters of what constitutes a serious event. As noted above, though, they classed mental retardation, opisthotonos, and removal of part of the intestine as not serious!
You have to wonder just how twisted other aspects of the report might be—and we don’t need to go far to see. GSK decided to add only one reference of additional risk to their Reference Safety Information. The only thing they decided to add was syncope (fainting), and even then they attempted to minimize it by stating:
Syncope (fainting) can occur following, or even before, any vaccination as a psychogenic response to the needle injection. It is important that procedures are in place to avoid injury from faints.
They deprecate the seriousness of fainting, which can be indicative of severe adverse effects, such as neurological damage, by saying that any vaccination can cause it and, worse, that it’s just an emotional reaction. There seems to be no limit to the degree that GSK will go in its effort to whitewash Infanrix.
Gaze palsy is a condition in which the eyes cannot track together. It’s generally indicative of brain damage. The report states that the European Medicines Agency has expressed concern about reports of Infanrix in association with this disorder. Therefore, the report specifically covers the problem.
The first question that comes to mind is: Why didn’t the EMA notify the public that there is some concern about Infanrix and this disorder? Surely, if the agency exists to protect the public, then any concern it has about Infanrix would be expressed so that parents could decide how to proceed. That, though, hasn’t happened.
GSK provides a large table listing 70 reported gaze palsy cases with associated symptoms. These include loss of consciousness, convulsion, spasms, cyanosis, opisthotonos, extrapyramidal disorder, and epilepsy. Most of these symptoms showed up in many cases. 45 of the 70 cases occurred on the day of vaccination.
They indicate that most of the cases cleared up without sequelae. Of course, they don’t spend any time on follow-up. What would have shown up if they’d watched these children for 2-5 years? Would brain damage then become more obvious?
It is now clear from a recent study that more doses of vaccines at one time result in significantly greater risk to health. As reported in Gaia Health, the mortality rate in children who have 5-8 vaccine doses at one time have a death rate that’s 50% greater than those who are given 1-4 vaccine doses.
That’s a highly significant risk. The study doesn’t focus on the specific causes of death, but instead clarifies that multivalent vaccines equate to seriously damaged health. The study also revealed that children with double the number of vaccine doses were twice as likely to be hospitalized.
The five antigen doses of Infanrix are in the range of the 5 to 8 doses that the study found cause 50% more child deaths and double the hospitalizations.
Your Right to Know?
Do you think there’s a right to know the risks of a vaccine before it’s administered? Do you think you should be informed that Infanrix can cause convulsions, epilepsy, autism, and a wide range of other devastating and life destroying damage?
In fact, the official document for the public goes to great lengths to indicate that there’s no excess risk with Infanrix. Aside from the standard boilerplate type of commentary, here’s what it says:
A history of febrile convulsions, a family history of convulsions or Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) do not constitute a contraindication for the use of Infanrix hexa. … [Emphasis mine]
… HIV infection is not considered as a contraindication. …
… Limited data in 169 premature infants indicate that Infanrix hexa can be given to premature children …
… Infanrix hexa should be administered with caution to subjects with thrombocytopenia or a bleeding disorder since bleeding may occur following an intramuscular administration to these subjects.
Of course, they may add a little note about the possibility of fainting, but there’s no need to worry! It’s just a psychological thing, something that could happen with any vaccine.
The approach is little more than a come-one-come-all carnival-like bid to get you in the door with Jen’s or Jeff’s arm, leg, or other body part sticking out, ready for administration of yet another toxic assault on your child.
That silly ol’ document showing all that nasty stuff that could happen? Don’t fret your little head over it! After all, you really weren’t supposed to know, anyway. Don’t worry. Trust us!
You surely don’t want to wander through GSK’s Garden of Secrets, do you?
1. CONFIDENTIAL TO REGULATORY AUTHORITIES. Combined Diphtheria, Tetanus and Acellular Pertussis, Hepatitis B, enhanced Inactivated Poliomyelitis and Haemophilus influenzae type B vaccine HERE
2. Safety of the Infanrix Hexa Vaccine: Confidential Document from GSK to the Authorities, Initiative Citroyenne press release. HERE
3. Mortality Rate 50% Higher with More Vaccine Doses HERE
4. Summary of Product Characteristics for Infanrix hexa HERE
Garden of GSK Secrets, by Catarina Carneiro de Sousa
Original cropped, text & GSK logo added
Creative Commons Share & Share Alike License, must give credit to Catarina Carneiroto to reuse
Vaccine Bombshell: Leaked Confidential Document Exposes 36 Infants Dead After This Vaccine
By Christina England
A report to the government noted babies died after receiving a vaccine.
A confidential GlaxoSmithKline document recently leaked to the press exposed that within a two-year period, a total of 36 infants died after receiving the 6-in-1 vaccine, Infanrix Hexa.  According to the website Initiative Citoyenne  who reported the news, the 1271 page document revealed that GlaxoSmithKline received a total of 1,742 reports of adverse reactions between October 23, 2009, and October 22, 2011, including 503 serious adverse reactions and 36 deaths. Initiative Citoyenne stated:
“It’s not that 14 deaths were recorded by GSK between October 2009 and end in October 2011 as we had originally calculated but 36 (14 from 2010 to 2011 and 22 from 2009 to 2010). In addition to these 36 deaths at least 37 other deaths (sudden death mainly), bringing the total to at least 73 deaths since the launch of the vaccine in 2000, and again, this concerns only the death by sudden death, no further recovery of under-reporting.”
Using the figure of 36 deaths over a two-year period, this averages 1.5 deaths per month, which by anyone’s standard is extremely high. Note that only 1 to 10% of adverse reactions to vaccines are actually reported. Therefore, in reality, the problem could potentially be far more serious and the actual number of fatalities much higher.
THE DEADLY CHEMICAL COCKTAIL
The charts show that many of the babies who died passed away within the first few days of receiving the vaccine.  A total of three infants were reported to have died within hours of receiving the vaccine. This tragedy is hardly surprising given the vaccine’s ingredients listed on the GSK Infanrix Hexa product information leaflet, which parents are rarely given the chance to read prior to vaccination, including non-infectious substances from tetanus, diphtheria bacteria, purified proteins of pertussis bacteria, the surface protein of the hepatitis B virus (HBsAg, derived from genetically engineered yeast cells) and inactivated poliovirus.  Each 0.5mL dose contains:
recombinant HBsAg protein
poliovirus Type 1
poliovirus Type 2
poliovirus Type 3
purified capsular polysaccharide of Hib covalently bound to tetanus toxoid
TOXIC DOSES OF TOXIC CHEMICALS
In an interesting article by Dr. Harold Buttram titled “The Ultimate Gamble: Do Childhood Vaccines Result in Genetic Hybridization from Alien Human and Animal DNA Contents?” he highlighted the problems associated with just two of these ingredients, including aluminum, which is a neurotoxin associated with Alzheimer’s disease and seizures, and formaldehyde, which is a known cancer-causing agent commonly used to embalm corpses. 
Dr. Harold Buttram also stated:
“It is universally recognized among toxicologists that combinations of toxic chemicals may bring exponential increases in toxicity; that is, two toxic chemicals in combination will bring a ten-fold or even a hundred-fold increase in toxicity.
A classical example of this principle was the Schubert study  in which it was found that the amount of lead and the amount of mercury, when each was given separately, would be lethal for one percent of rats tested, would become lethal for one hundred percent of rats tested when combined.
In vaccines this principle would apply at least to mercury and aluminum, both of which are potent neurotoxins.”
Considering this information, is it any wonder that babies are dying after receiving vaccinations containing these ingredients? GlaxoSmithKline may try and hide the facts from us but they cannot hide them forever. Infanrix Hexa should be removed from the market immediately.
1. Confidential To Regulatory Authorities – Biological Clinical Safety and Pharmacovgilance – GlaxoSmithKline Research and Development Avenue Fleming 20 1300 Wavre Belgium HERE
2. Initiative Citoyenne HERE
3. Initiative Citoyenne Charts HERE
4. Infanrix Hexa product information leaflet HERE
Australian researchers find mercury in supposedly mercury-free Infanrix Hexa vaccine
Australian researchers found that a sample of the Infanrix hexa vaccine tested positive for mercury at 10 ppb. The result was confirmed and validated by retesting the original sample. Follow-up testing was conducted on three additional samples of Infanrix hexa (one from the same production lot and two from a different lot). All three tested positive for Hg (average of 9.7 ppb). Although the levels of Hg detected are substantially lower than any established exposure safety limits, the results of this study reveal that inaccuracies exist in public health messages, professional communications, and official documentation regarding Hg content in at least one childhood vaccine. In the interests of public health, it is incumbent on vaccine manufacturers and responsible agencies such as the Therapeutic Goods Administration and the Federal Department of Health and Ageing to address this issue as a matter of urgency.
SOURCE: Mercury in vaccines from the Australian childhood immunization program schedule
– Mother relates her daughter’s reaction to the Infanrix Hexa vaccine:
I am getting in touch with you with regards to my daughter Joy who has itching nodules and contact allergy to aluminium after vaccination with INFANRIX® hexa from the manufacturer GlaxoSmithKline. My daughter has been suffering for more than 2 years. She cannot sleep at night from the pain and scratches until she bleeds and her condition is getting worse.
I was wondering if you can help me find a solution to remove the aluminium from her body or to get in touch with other parents with similar problem so that we can look for a solution together.
I would also like to know if anyone knows anything about claiming damages for all the pain and suffering she is going through from GlaxoSmithKline as well as my private insurance company? Thank you!
L. P., Spain
– Infanrix hexa vaccine and sudden unexpected deaths – Jacob M. Puliyel MD MRCP M Phil
– How vaccines harm child brain development by Dr Russell Blaylock MD
– To vaccinate or not?
According to GSK, “GlaxoSmithKline is a global healthcare company that is committed to helping people to do more, feel better and live longer.”
GlaxoSmithKline’s six-vaccines-in-one-injection Infanrix Hexa vaccine is used in 90 countries. In New Zealand, the Infanrix Hexa vaccine is injected into infants of consenting parents at 6 weeks, at 3 months and 5 months in accordance with the government-promoted vaccination schedule shown here:
– Doctor Claims That Hexavalent Infanrix Vaccine Causes Sudden Death Of Babies,’ Anti-Vaccination Advocates Question Why Report Was Confidential
– Vaccine Bombshell: Leaked Confidential Document Exposes 36 Infants Dead After This Vaccine
– Confidential GSK Infanrix Adverse Event Report
– Infanrix hexa and sudden death: a review of the periodic safety update reports submitted to the European Medicines Agency.