Vaccinologists, Adjuvants and Nanoparticles
When retired, prominent vaccine developer Maurice Hilleman made a noteworthy statement; he said:
“I think that vaccines have to be considered the bargain basement technology for the 20th century.” HERE
I was reminded of this when reading about Polysorbate 80 added to vaccines HERE this morning, and then again when reading some medical articles about another type of vaccine ingredients referred to as adjuvants used to enhance the body’s immune response to the antigens in vaccines.
Do You Want to Remain Informed about the Latest Vaccine News?
According to vaccinology lore, vaccination imitates natural infection by introducing a disease-causing agent (antigen) which has been rendered harmless into an organism to “teach it” to produce protective antibodies in response to this invasion, but without causing the actual disease. This is said to equip the organism with the ability to produce protective antibodies at short notice in the event of the organism being exposed to the actual disease.
While this sounds like a nice theory, it doesn’t seem to be sound. Vaccination theory as well as the germ theory of disease it is based on appear to be models which amount to misinterpretations and misrepresentations of reality. The natural processes vaccination theory and and the germ theory of disease are allegedly based on appear to be as poorly understood as the workings of vaccine adjuvants in the body, as we shall see.
To claim that vaccinations imitate natural infection is nonsense for a start, as natural infections elicit an appropriate immune response without having to rely on adjuvants like aluminium (aluminum or alum in the USA) or squalene to produce antibody levels deemed adequate to produce immunity, a subject which is yet another can of worms all by itself.
One would be greatly mistaken to think that vaccinology is an exact science, or even is a science for that matter. I found reading these vaccinologists papers concerning vaccine adjuvants both eye-opening as well as alarming. Far from gaining an impression that these scientists dedicated to protecting our health actually know what they are doing, I was left with the feeling that they are groping in the dark while trying to figure out how their concoctions and the hare-brained and dangerous ideas based on unproven theories they unleash on the unfortunately far too trusting public actually work.
On reading what vaccinologists discuss with each other pertaining to the use of adjuvants, I thought I would share a few tidbits I gleaned from them. Some of the terms are quite technical, but I just skipped those and suggest you do the same, we after just want to be well-informed parents and don’t intend to become immunologists, or vaccinologists for that matter! So here are a few of the articles, listed in chronological order:
——————————-
1998
Dendritic cells internalize vaccine adjuvant after intramuscular injection. SOURCE
Excerpt:
“Vaccine adjuvants help antigens elicit rapid, potent, and long-lasting immune responses. The lack of understanding of the immunological mechanism of action of adjuvants has limited the rational development of vaccines for human use. In particular, little is known about how the immune system processes adjuvants.”
Well, it obviously hasn’t hindered the irrational development of vaccines for human use, including the widespread use of aluminium in vaccines for public use! Keep in mind that aluminium is highly neurotoxic, meaning it is especially toxic to the brain and nervous system. Here is what US neurosurgeon Dr Russell Blaylock MD says about it:
“The aluminium and mercury used in vaccines are significant neurotoxins which play a major role in all neurodegerative disorders. It is also important to remember that both these metals accumulate in the brain and spinal cord. This makes them much more dangerous than rapidly excreted toxins.
Numerous studies have shown harmful effects when aluminium accumulates in the brain, including Alzheimer’s disease and ALS (Lou Gehrig’s disease). This may also explain the tenfold increase in Alzheimer’s disease in those receiving the flu vaccine five years in a row.
In both human and animal studies aluminium hydroxide or aluminium phosphate used in vaccines showed a strong causal relationship with macrophagic myofascitis, a condition causing profound weakness and multiple neurological syndromes, one of which closely resembles multiple sclerosis (MS).
Postnatal brain development – from birth to age six or seven – involves the find-tuning of synaptic connections, dendritic development and neural pathway refinement, all of which prepare the brain for more complex thinking. These brain elements are very sensitive to toxins and excessive brain stimulation during this period.
Our society is littered with millions of children who have been harmed in one degree or another by vaccinations. in addition, let us not forget the millions of parents who have had to watch helplessly as their children have been destroyed by devastating vaccination programs.”
To watch Dr Blaylock’s lecture ‘How Vaccines Harm Child Brain Development’click HERE
——————————–
The next article concerns the different adjuvant, called MF59. I found the following information concerning MF59 on Wikipedia:
MF59 is an immunologic adjuvant that uses squalene. It is Novartis’ proprietary adjuvant that is added to influenza vaccines to help stimulate the human body’s immune response through production of CD4 memory cells. MF59 is the first oil-in-water influenza vaccine adjuvant to be commercialized in combination with a seasonal influenza virus vaccine. MF59 is used as an adjuvant in Europe whereas; in the United States Alum (aluminum hydroxide) is used. It was developed in the 1990s by researchers at Ciba-Geigy, a Novartis heritage company, and Chiron, acquired by Novartis in 2006.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MF59
The 2001 article is called:
Immunization with the adjuvant MF59 induces macrophage trafficking and apoptosis. HERE
Excerpt:
“The mechanisms associated with the immunostimulatory activity of vaccine adjuvants are still poorly understood.”
——————————-
2009
Towards an understanding of the adjuvant action of aluminium. HERE
Excerpt:
“Abstract
The efficacy of vaccines depends on the presence of an adjuvant in conjunction with the antigen. Of these adjuvants, the ones that contain aluminium, which were first discovered empirically in 1926, are currently the most widely used. However, a detailed understanding of their mechanism of action has only started to be revealed. In this Timeline article, we briefly describe the initial discovery of aluminium adjuvants and discuss historically important advances. We also summarize recent progress in the field and discuss their implications and the remaining questions on how these adjuvants work.”
I find it remarkable that aluminium has been used as an adjuvant in vaccines since 1926, but that vaccinologists appear to be largely in the dark about what happens to it when in the body as well as regarding its effect on the body; also that these vaccinologists use mice to learn more, yet that it has been widely used in childhood and adult vaccines since 1926.
———————————
Also from 2009:
“4.3.7 Carcinogenicity of adjuvants
As adjuvants are intended to be used only a few times with low dosages the risk of induction of
tumours by these compounds in a direct way is negligable. Furthermore, the action of the
adjuvant is to stimulate the immune system, and not to act as a general immunosuppressant,
reducing the risk on the spontaneous formation of lymphoid tumours. Therefore, carcinogenicity
studies are not needed.” HERE
I don’t find this assuring as I have so far come across three people who developed cancer at the vaccine injection site and had to have it surgically removed. I understand that cancers at the injection site are also common in animals.
——————————-
2010
The immunobiology of aluminium adjuvants: how do they really work? HERE
Quote:
“Abstract
Aluminium adjuvants potentiate the immune response, thereby ensuring the potency and efficacy of typically sparingly available antigen. Their concomitant critical importance in mass vaccination programmes may have prompted recent intense interest in understanding how they work and their safety. Progress in these areas is stymied, however, by a lack of accessible knowledge pertaining to the bioinorganic chemistry of aluminium adjuvants, and, consequently, the inappropriate application and interpretation of experimental models of their mode of action. The objective herein is, therefore, to identify the many ways that aluminium chemistry contributes to the wide and versatile armoury of its adjuvants, such that future research might be guided towards a fuller understanding of their role in human vaccinations.”
In summary: “Trust as, even though we don’t really know what we are doing!”
———————————
2011
Vaccine adjuvants alum and MF59 induce rapid recruitment of neutrophils and monocytes that participate in antigen transport to draining lymph nodes. HERE
Quote:
“Vaccine adjuvants such as alum and the oil-in-water emulsion MF59 are used to enhance immune responses towards pure soluble antigens, but their mechanism of action is still largely unclear.”
———————————
The following 2013 article mentions the use of nanoparticles in vaccines; find out more about nanoparticles HERE
How Aluminum Nanoparticles in Vaccines Reach the Brain
Slow CCL2-dependent translocation of biopersistent particles from muscle to brain http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3616851/
Excerpt:
“Results
Intramuscular injection of alum-containing vaccine was associated with the appearance of aluminum deposits in distant organs, such as spleen and brain where they were still detected one year after injection. Both fluorescent materials injected into muscle translocated to draining lymph nodes (DLNs) and thereafter were detected associated with phagocytes in blood and spleen. Particles linearly accumulated in the brain up to the six-month endpoint; they were first found in perivascular CD11b+ cells and then in microglia and other neural cells….
Conclusion
Nanomaterials can be transported by monocyte-lineage cells to DLNs, blood and spleen, and … may use CCL2-dependent mechanisms to penetrate the brain. This occurs at a very low rate in normal conditions explaining good overall tolerance of alum despite its strong neurotoxic potential. However, continuously escalating doses of this poorly biodegradable adjuvant in the population may become insidiously unsafe, especially in the case of overimmunization or immature/altered blood brain barrier or high constitutive CCL-2 production.
Background
Nanomaterials have various innovative medical applications including drug and gene delivery, imaging contrast fluids, topical antimicrobials, surgery tools and vaccines [1]. Due to the growing number of novel compounds and formulations, data on their specific biodistribution, persistence and toxicity are generally lacking [1], and clarification regarding how the body handles small particles, especially those which interact with immune cells [2], is urgently needed. Once defined, these basic mechanisms which govern host-particle interactions should be integrated with specific properties of nanomaterials (size, shape, surface, and solubility) to enable predictions of their beneficial or adverse effects.
The use of nanomaterials in humans is not as contemporary as is recently portrayed. For decades, alum, a nanocrystalline compound formed of aluminum oxyhydroxide, has been the most commonly used adjuvant in vaccines. The mechanism by which it stimulates the immune response is incompletely understood [3]. While alum is generally well tolerated, it is occasionally reported as the cause of disabling health problems in individuals with ill-defined susceptibility factors [4-6]. Clinical manifestations attributed to alum are paradigmatic of the so-called autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants (ASIA), a syndrome also observed in patients exposed to silicone gel [7]. They include delayed onset of diffuse myalgia [4], chronic fatigue [8] and stereotyped cognitive dysfunction [9]. The persistence of alum-loaded macrophages is typically detected at sites of previous injections (up to >12 years later), resulting in a specific granuloma called macrophagic myofasciitis or MMF [4]. Although the biopersistence of adjuvants is a priori undesirable, the exact significance of this remains the subject of some debate since the biodistribution of slowly biodegradable particles following injection into muscle is currently unknown.
There appears to be a fine balance between the efficacy of alum adjuvant and its potential toxicity, and there is good evidence that these may be one and the same effect [3]. Both the efficacy and the potential toxicity of alum will be influenced by whether the bioactive nanomaterial remains localized at injection points or rather scatters and accumulates in distant organs and tissues.”
——————————-
Read Jeffry Aufderheide’s article about this topic HERE
So, if I get this right, the aluminium nanoparticles are injected into the body when an aluminium-containing vaccine is given and the Polysorbate 80’s task is to deliver it to the brain?
According to neurosurgeon Russell L. Blaylock, degenerative disease, especially neurological disorders like Alzheimer’s are growing at an alarming rate, partly due to these ingredients in vaccines but now also increasingly due to the mass spraying of nano-sized aluminum into the atmosphere. HERE
Dr Blaylock says that according to medical literature, nanosized particles are “infinitely more reactive and induce intense inflammation in a number of tissues”.
He also states: “Of special concern is the effect these nanoparticles have on the brain and spinal cord” and warns about “the growing list of neuro-degenerative diseases, including Alzheimer’s dementia, Parkinson’s disease, and Lou Gehrig’s disease.”
That we are bombarded with massive amounts of aluminium nanoparticles via chemtrail activity and we and our children are furthermore exposed to nanoparticles via common household products HERE seems all the more reason to keep our and our children’s bodies vaccine-free because to have nanoparticles INJECTED into us as well would be extremely foolish!
My friend Edda West of the Vaccination Risk Awareness Network in Canada has in my opinion summed up the situation very well with these words:
“Our medical system is using our children for an experiment with an abusive and invasive technology. The foreign protein, viruses and DNA injected affect children’s genetic make-up and wreak havoc in ways we can’t even imagine. We can no longer remain complacent or trust that health authorities have our best interest at heart or know what they are doing. We can no longer entrust the health and future of our children to a system that has long ago abandoned its guiding principle of “First, do no harm”.
Finally, here is a recent video by Mike Adams which is incorrect in some details but in my opinion right on the button as far as its main message goes HERE
It seems to me that the real science behind vaccination revolves around how to maintain the illusion that vaccines prevent diseases in the face of a growing awareness among parents and others that – as Dr Blaylock puts it:
“The entire vaccine program is based on massive fraud.”
——————————–
RELATED:
– Aluminum in Vaccines: History and Toxicity (EXCELLENT INFORMATION!)
June 22, 2017
https://thinklovehealthy.com/2017/06/22/aluminum-in-vaccines-history-and-toxicity/
———-
– A Glimpse into the Scary World of Vaccine Adjuvants
http://www.whale.to/vaccine/west_edda.html
“Our medical system is using our children for an experiment with an abusive and invasive technology. The foreign protein, viruses and DNA injected affect children’s genetic make-up and wreak havoc in ways we can’t even imagine. We can no longer remain complacent or trust that health authorities have our best interest at heart or know what they are doing. We can no longer entrust the health and future of our children to a system that has long ago abandoned its guiding principle of “First, do no harm”.
Edda West
Vaccine Choice Canada – Public Information & Resource Group
vaccinechoicecanada.com/
———-